Test Nano Vario
Most pilots are typical local mountain pilots, fly tandem privately or commercially or only do hike and fly. A simple vario without too many technical accessories, such as the Nano Vario, is sufficient for this.
Most pilots are typical local mountain pilots, fly tandem privately or commercially or only do hike and fly. A simple vario without too many technical accessories, such as the Nano Vario, is sufficient for this.
The Niviuk Arrow P 2 is the successor to the P and the light version of the Arrow, which I have been flying for some time now. In contrast to the Arrow, the P version is the lightweight version and is therefore intended for hike-and-fly and bivouac pilots.
As I announced at the beginning of November, I would like to test harnesses at regular intervals. The first harness in this series was the lightweight harness The Sock from AirDesign.
In the relevant specialist magazines, forums and blogs, harnesses tend to play a subordinate role. Reason enough for me to test harnesses regularly and publish a report on them here in this blog. But what are the criteria for a test that is as objective as possible?
I have been flying the Arrow harness from the Spanish manufacturer Niviuk for a year now. Time for a review of the harness. I have flown around 55 hours in various conditions. The longest flight lasted just over 5 hours, but there were also a few short glides.
I use AI in my blog to translate German texts into English. This works quite well for the most part, but sometimes the meaning of the text is not recognised and translated incorrectly. Could AI answer my questions about paragliding in the various disciplines? Would it be conceivable to dispense with the knowledge in forums, YouTube, blogs, fellow pilots, books etc. and rely solely on text-based AI à la ChatGPT? I have asked one question from various category and checked ChatGPT's answer for accuracy.